Supreme Court to Hear Argument in Three Cases TodayBy Andrew Gimigliano on 11/08/2017
Posted In Oral Argument, Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of New Jersey is set to hear argument in three cases today. As detailed by the Clerk’s office:
State v. Dickerson – Is the State required to produce search warrant information (including the affidavit filed in support of the search warrant and supporting investigative reports) prior to a detention hearing held pursuant to the Criminal Justice Reform Act (CJRA), N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26?
State v. Shaw; State v. Bolden – Was the statement uttered by defendant while detained in a police vehicle the result of an unlawful detention; and, under the circumstances presented, must defendant show a protected privacy interest in the tote bag where drug evidence was found?
Spade v. Select Comfort Corp.; Wenger v. Bob’s Discount Furniture, LLC – Is a consumer who receives a contract that does not comply with the Delivery of Household Furniture and Furnishings Regulations (Furniture Delivery Regulations), N.J.A.C. 13:45A-5, but has not suffered any adverse consequences from the noncompliance, an “aggrieved consumer” under the Truth-in-Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA), N.J.S.A. 56:12-17; and, does a violation of the Furniture Delivery Regulations alone constitute a violation of a clearly established right or responsibility of the seller under the TCCWNA and thus provide a basis for relief under the TCCWNA?